Palantir and UK policy: Public health, public IT, and – dispute it with me – open public contracts

Column The news that openDemocracy is searching out for a licensed review of Matt Hancock’s allegedly unlawful deal with Palantir is a signal of two things: that things have long gone unhealthy and are going wronger in government health policy; and that there are silent methods to open to put it apart upright.

What’s more enchanting is never any longer finding a process to repair things, but stage an intervention for a government beneath the impact of alcohol on energy, corruption and incompetence.

The strategy of an inoculation in opposition to affords luxuriate in the one inked with the controversial substantial data analytics company has of dull been illustrated on a world scale luxuriate in by no draw ahead of. In pills, confidentiality protects the patient however the absolute reverse informs the science. We’re all seriously better versed this One year than closing in how scientific trials work: ethical probity is established, protocols are chosen from known correct, confirmed alternatives, outcomes and their prognosis fight through strict impartial assessments, and a public regulator lastly looks the least bit of the component ahead of approval.

NHS hosptial photo, by Marbury via Shutterstock

Campaigners ask judicial review of NHS deal with Peter Thiel’s AI company Palantir


This process is both lengthy-established and evolving. It be on the total dull, but our self belief in it draw we purchased our vaccines from lab to jab in 10 months, no longer 10 years, with out breaking any solutions. The essence is openness, evidence and scrutiny, and it turns out that with property and motivation you should well per chance well presumably also fabricate all that very rapid indeed with out shortcuts. The same solutions show all of science, and as a result we now have got an worldwide of miracles. The sinister things happen when we ignore the solutions: you should well per chance well presumably ask Dr Li Wenliang, if he were silent with us.

Let’s compare the mannequin of scientific rectitude to the Palantir contract. It has many sins, however the supreme is secrecy. It could well per chance well be that the work Palantir has been hired to manufacture is neatly-fashioned, with sure objectives, comely acceptable technology, solid interior governance and a truly correct investment in the nation’s health.

It’s unlikely, given the federal government’s song file on IT in fresh and health IT namely: either draw, we can not expose.

Would you accumulate a vaccine that had been commissioned illegally and developed in secret, by folks with a history in natural battle, with none of the regulatory assessments – indeed, flying in their face? If no longer, why would you accumulate the very essence of the NHS, its data, being swallowed up by this kind of process?

Health minister Matt Hancock closing week turned into as soon as stumbled on by a Excessive Court contemplate to have acted unlawfully [PDF] and to have made a “transparency breach” by failing to post particulars of contracts within 30 days. His excuse, no defence in regulations, turned into as soon as that things were going down in actual fact rapid and did we favor to all die whereas he stuffed in some pettifogging kinds? No, Mr Hancock, we wished to live and we wished you to salvage in the pettifogging kinds. Rent extra folks. Enact your job. Apply the regulations.

All of us know that doing things in an emergency at unheard of tempo does no longer point out breaking the foundations. Our bouquet of vaccines is proof of that. Here’s terribly appropriate for presidency contracts, where whenever you can favor to soar through hoops in the name of the rattling regulations, you rent enough folks to manufacture the jumping. That is how the vaccines were well-liked in file time. The property were allocated. Other folks were hired. The job turned into as soon as completed. The guidelines were followed.

We love our NHS

Printed: NHS England bosses meet with tech and pharmaceutical giants to focus on label checklist of millions of Brits’ scientific data


Even Hancock’s wafer-thin excuse can’t screech with Palantir. This contract is the result of discussions (effortlessly flawed for junketing) started neatly ahead of the pandemic. It applies a ways extra broadly than pandemic administration.

What’s at stake could well per chance well barely be better. The government is reorganising the NHS and taking alter motivate from the trusts and areas, and giving it all motivate to Dr Illegal Matt. And what does his scientific judgment gaze luxuriate in? With Palantir, he’s giving our money and our health data to an organization which is deeply implicated in helping elect and making the most of Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory and subsequent no-show contracts.

A company with deep connections with the CIA, the NSA, the FBI – curiously if it’s purchased three letters in its name and wears darkish glasses, it’s a buyer.

Yet none of that matters namely. It’s a distraction, at simplest a motivation to ignite your outrage into activism. Lets behold Hancock breach the regulations again, which must silent topic – but with a government dedicated to defensive actions, it’ll be classes realized, paunchy self belief, topic closed, time to switch on, how dare these lawyers lawyer, stunning tunnel, whaff whaff whaff.

What matters is tiring and pragmatic and unarguable: does these items work, is it assemble, is it worth the money? When the department is enlighten in breach, again, there will doubtless be of enterprise no longer to demand Hancock’s head, but for his spreadsheets. Let’s screech the identical solutions to government health contracts as we fabricate to pills development. Palantir says it retains data assemble: who cares? Let’s behold the particulars. The interior methods. The audit trails. Don’t need that? Ravishing, don’t gather the job. Confidentiality is for the details, no longer your carrying out administration powerpoints.

What is going to the outcomes gaze luxuriate in? How will we know success? What is going to happen in any other case? These are the very fundamentals of carrying out oversight, and we deserve them. Proof says we need them. We’ve got a government that has paid a pair of billions for song and hint, utterly to have the fourth top doubtless per-capita loss of life price from COVID-19 in the realm. If that turned into as soon as the result of a scientific trial – assuming it ever purchased past ethics – what fabricate you train the chances of the identical scientists being allowed to employ the identical methods over and over?

It’s needed to contrivance a line in the sand, pointless to dispute. To claim that a secret contract (potentially illegally) handing NHS money and data to an organization mired in surveillance and murk is a step too a ways, even for this lot. If you care, conclude messing about and enhance openDemocracy every which draw.

However better than that, to assist the snake oil and corruption out of public IT in the long term, the time is now to instruct we know what works, because 18 million of us have an armful. All of us know what doesn’t work: because we now have got a graveyard paunchy. If you’re an MP, what to manufacture. If you’re no longer, then acquire one and screech enlightenment. Dispute what we need and gather the observe out. A clear message, ready to head, if amplified by enough folks, will cut throughout the thickest ministerial skin.

Even Hancock knows what it draw in an outbreak to refuse the vaccine. ®

Back to top button