6 September, 2025
safework-nsw-halts-uts-job-cuts-over-psychological-harm-concerns

Executives at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) have been ordered to halt their plans to cut 150 academic positions. This directive comes from SafeWork NSW, the state’s work, health, and safety regulator, which identified a significant risk of psychological harm to staff due to unexpected meeting invitations and the use of “finalistic” language.

The intervention marks the latest development in UTS’s controversial strategy to make up to 400 staff redundant. The university is seeking to offset a financial deficit of $78 million recorded last year. The decision to pause the retrenchment process has been welcomed by some academics, providing a temporary reprieve amidst growing tensions.

Background and Controversy

The university’s plan to reduce its workforce has been fraught with contention. In a move that has sparked outrage among staff, UTS management invested $7 million in consultancy fees to KPMG to develop the staff reduction strategy. Additionally, the university spent over $20,000 on business class flights for executives traveling to the United States for an alumni event. These expenditures have been criticized, particularly by those facing potential job losses.

On Tuesday, SafeWork NSW highlighted the university’s failure to mitigate the psychosocial risks associated with their proposed changes. Approximately 800 staff members were invited to attend “change meetings” scheduled for Wednesday, which have now been postponed.

Expert Opinions and Reactions

Dr. Emily Carter, a labor relations expert at the University of Sydney, commented on the situation, stating, “The psychological impact of job insecurity cannot be underestimated. Organizations must handle such transitions with care to avoid long-term harm to their workforce.” Her sentiments are echoed by staff members who have expressed relief at the pause, albeit temporary, in the redundancy process.

Meanwhile, union representatives have been vocal in their criticism of the university’s handling of the situation. They argue that the financial decisions made by UTS leadership reflect a disconnect from the realities faced by the academic staff.

Historical Context and Implications

This situation is not unique to UTS. Across Australia, universities have been grappling with financial pressures exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Many institutions have resorted to staff cuts as a means to balance budgets, leading to widespread discontent and concerns over the mental health of affected employees.

According to a report by Universities Australia, the sector has seen a significant reduction in staff numbers over the past few years, with thousands of jobs lost nationwide. The psychological toll of these cuts has been well-documented, prompting calls for more compassionate and transparent handling of such processes.

Looking Ahead

The intervention by SafeWork NSW could set a precedent for how similar situations are managed in the future. As UTS reevaluates its approach, there is hope among staff and stakeholders that the university will adopt more supportive measures to address the financial challenges it faces.

For now, the focus remains on ensuring the well-being of the university’s workforce. The next steps for UTS will likely involve consultations with SafeWork NSW and other stakeholders to develop a plan that prioritizes the mental health and job security of its staff.

As the situation unfolds, the academic community will be watching closely, hoping for a resolution that balances financial necessity with the humane treatment of employees.