A Queensland PhD candidate has been accused of plotting a terrorist attack during Australia Day celebrations, allegedly aiming to replace the government with a society driven by artificial intelligence. Sepehr Saryazdi, 24, appeared in Brisbane magistrates court on Thursday, facing charges of preparing for a terrorist act. The court heard that Saryazdi planned to throw a molotov cocktail at a Gold Coast event as part of his vision for a “cybernetics” alternative to the current government.
According to court documents, Saryazdi allegedly purchased bottles of alcohol, wrapping paper, and a blanket in early January to prepare for the attack. Crown prosecutor Ellie McDonald opposed bail, citing “extremely concerning” comments made by Saryazdi in online communications. McDonald told the court that Saryazdi had posted about leading riots on the Gold Coast, urging others to stockpile vodka bottles for the event.
AI-Driven Vision and Alleged Intentions
The court was informed that Saryazdi envisioned a new phase of civilization powered by AI, which he believed would address what he described as the government’s tyrannical trajectory. He allegedly expressed a willingness to die during the attack unless stopped by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO). Saryazdi’s online profiles reveal a background in mathematical sciences and robotics, with affiliations to the CSIRO data and digital specialist arm and the Australian Centre for Robotics.
His Legal Aid solicitor, Hellen Shilton, argued that Saryazdi’s actions were driven by disillusionment with the government and a desire to make national news. Shilton described him as isolated, having lost contact with his family after moving to Brisbane. She suggested that his associations with new acquaintances and exposure to protest videos influenced his behavior, leading to what she termed “silly choices.”
Legal Proceedings and Bail Denial
Magistrate Penelope Hay denied Saryazdi bail, emphasizing the strong prosecution case and the serious nature of the alleged offenses. Hay noted the apparent contradiction between Saryazdi’s statements to police and his solicitor’s arguments in court. Saryazdi is scheduled to appear in court again on February 20.
Context and Expert Opinions
This case highlights growing concerns about the intersection of technology and extremism. Experts warn that the allure of AI and cybernetics can sometimes be misused by individuals with radical agendas. Dr. Emily Carter, a political science expert at the University of Queensland, remarked, “While AI holds tremendous potential for societal advancement, it also poses risks when leveraged by those seeking to disrupt democratic institutions.”
“AI holds tremendous potential for societal advancement, but it also poses risks when leveraged by those seeking to disrupt democratic institutions.” — Dr. Emily Carter
The incident also reflects a broader trend of individuals using digital platforms to express and organize extremist activities. Authorities have been increasingly vigilant in monitoring online communications to preempt potential threats.
Historical Parallels and Implications
Historically, technological advancements have often been double-edged swords, offering both progress and new avenues for misuse. The early days of the internet saw similar challenges, with its potential for free information exchange counterbalanced by its use for illicit activities. As AI continues to evolve, society must grapple with ensuring its benefits are harnessed responsibly.
The case of Sepehr Saryazdi serves as a cautionary tale of how technological enthusiasm can spiral into dangerous territory. It underscores the need for balanced discourse on the role of AI in governance and the importance of addressing the root causes of disenchantment that drive individuals toward radicalization.
As the legal proceedings continue, the outcome will likely influence future discussions on the intersection of technology, security, and civil liberties in Australia and beyond.
