A Queensland PhD candidate has been accused of planning a terrorist attack on an Australia Day event, allegedly intending to use a molotov cocktail to incite chaos and promote a new AI-driven society. Sepehr Saryazdi, 24, appeared in Brisbane Magistrates Court on Thursday, charged with preparing for a terrorist act.
According to court documents, Saryazdi allegedly planned to target a Gold Coast celebration, posting online about leading “riots” on the tourist strip. The court heard he purchased items such as alcohol bottles and wrapping paper earlier in January, purportedly for the attack.
Alleged Motives and Online Activity
Crown prosecutor Ellie McDonald presented evidence of Saryazdi’s online communications, which included alarming messages on Facebook. “He states, ‘I’ll be leading the Gold Coast riots on January 26’,” McDonald told the court. Saryazdi allegedly encouraged others to prepare for the event, suggesting they stockpile vodka bottles.
The court also heard that Saryazdi expected to die during the attack unless intercepted by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO). He allegedly described his actions as “purely logical given the trajectory of this nation,” advocating for a society led by AI and data analysis.
“I recommend learning how to shoot guns at shooting ranges while you can,” Saryazdi allegedly stated on Facebook.
Background and Personal Circumstances
Saryazdi holds a master’s degree in mathematical sciences from the University of Sydney and is a PhD candidate affiliated with the CSIRO and the Australian Centre for Robotics. His Legal Aid solicitor, Hellen Shilton, described him as isolated and influenced by new acquaintances and protest videos.
“He admits he became quite overwhelmed emotionally,” Shilton explained. “He felt he should do something with the way the world was going … it was never his intention to hurt anyone.”
Shilton argued that Saryazdi’s actions were misguided, noting he had never participated in protests before. She suggested that the reality of his plans began to sink in as he acquired materials for the alleged attack.
Legal Proceedings and Implications
Magistrate Penelope Hay denied Saryazdi bail, citing the strength of the prosecution’s case and his alleged connection to violent intentions. “Contrary to admissions he made that he intended to throw a molotov cocktail in a public place on Australia Day and overthrow the government?” Hay remarked.
Saryazdi was remanded in custody and is scheduled to appear in court again on February 20. The case raises questions about the influence of radical ideas in academia and the role of technology in shaping societal visions.
Broader Context and Expert Opinions
This case highlights a growing trend of individuals seeking radical change through technology-driven ideologies. Experts warn that the allure of AI and cybernetics can sometimes lead to extreme interpretations and actions.
Dr. Emily Carter, a sociologist specializing in technology and society, explains, “While AI offers incredible potential, it also poses risks when individuals or groups view it as a panacea for societal issues. It’s crucial to balance innovation with ethical considerations.”
As the legal proceedings continue, the broader implications of Saryazdi’s alleged plot will be closely monitored by both legal experts and those interested in the intersection of technology and governance.
