Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sparked controversy during an interview on Wednesday by asserting that American conservatives criticizing his government are not truly part of the “MAGA” movement. Speaking to Breitbart, a conservative-populist news outlet, Netanyahu stated, “And let me say one more thing — you talked about the ‘woke right’? Some of these people call themselves MAGA [Make America Great Again]. They’re not MAGA.”
Netanyahu further emphasized the importance of Israel as a key ally of the United States, stating, “Israel is the best ally of the United States. Israel is fighting Iran, and you can’t be MAGA if you’re pro-Iran, you can’t be MAGA if you’re anti-Israel. President Trump understands this, and he stands very strongly with us.”
The comments have ignited a debate over what it means to be “MAGA,” particularly among prominent figures within the movement who have criticized Israel’s actions in Gaza. This development comes as Netanyahu seeks to align rhetorically with former President Donald Trump and his core base, many of whom have historically supported Israel.
Defining ‘MAGA’ Amidst Criticism
Netanyahu’s assertion challenges the positions of several high-profile figures within the MAGA movement, including Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene. Known for her staunch loyalty to Trump, Greene has been vocal in her criticism of Israel’s military actions in Gaza, describing them as “genocide.” In a post on X, she wrote, “It’s the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct. 7 in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza.”
Greene’s comments reflect a broader sentiment among some American conservatives who prioritize an “America First” perspective, often questioning foreign interventions and alliances. Her views have made her a frequent target of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).
Voices of Dissent Within the Movement
Meanwhile, independent pundit Tucker Carlson, another influential MAGA figure, has also criticized Israel’s government. Carlson’s platform has featured guests who condemn Israel’s actions in Palestine, including author John Mearsheimer, who described the situation in Gaza as a genocide.
Carlson’s interview with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian further fueled controversy, highlighting a divide within the movement between those who support traditional Republican foreign policy and those advocating for a more isolationist approach. During an interview with Senator Ted Cruz, Carlson questioned the biblical justification for unwavering support of Israel, exposing a rift in conservative circles.
The Broader Implications
The debate over what constitutes “MAGA” extends beyond individual figures to the movement’s core principles. Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon has also weighed in, questioning Netanyahu’s interventions and emphasizing the “America First” ethos that characterized Trump’s campaigns.
Trump’s foreign policy stance has been marked by a departure from the neoconservative policies of previous Republican administrations, which often involved extensive foreign interventions. This shift has resonated with many Americans, contributing to Trump’s electoral successes in 2016 and 2020.
“While many can make valid claims to MAGA, the foreign policy promise — if not always the actions — of the movement was to break with Republicans of old and to put the United States before the interests of other nations, whether they be Iraq, Afghanistan, or Israel.”
As the debate continues, figures like Marjorie Taylor Greene advocate for an “America Only” approach, underscoring the ongoing evolution of the MAGA movement and its implications for U.S. foreign policy.
Looking Ahead
The controversy surrounding Netanyahu’s comments highlights the complexities of defining political movements and the challenges of maintaining ideological coherence amid diverse viewpoints. As the 2024 election approaches, the role of U.S.-Israel relations in shaping conservative politics will likely remain a contentious issue.
Observers will be watching closely to see how these debates influence the direction of the MAGA movement and its impact on American foreign policy. The outcome could have significant implications for both domestic politics and international alliances.
