On the final parliamentary sitting day of 2025, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese walked briskly into Parliament House, past a throng of television cameras eager to capture his arrival. Inside, he was in high spirits, celebrating the passage of landmark environmental protection laws with the support of the Greens. This was Albanese at his best: a political strategist, solving problems, and outmaneuvering opponents, notably the Liberals and Nationals, to secure another victory.
However, if this legislative triumph showcased Albanese’s strengths, his handling of the tragic Bondi Beach massacre has revealed some of his vulnerabilities as a national leader. In the absence of a deal to broker or an adversary to outmaneuver, Albanese had to rely on swift judgment and consistent communication in response to an unprecedented tragedy. Despite his earnest efforts to console and unite a grieving nation, he faced criticism for his initial response.
Albanese’s Response and the Call for an Inquiry
The Prime Minister’s decision to initiate a royal commission into antisemitism and social cohesion, within just 25 days of the shooting, signifies a significant governmental commitment. This initiative includes revising hate speech laws and implementing stricter gun controls. Yet, the comprehensive nature of this response has been somewhat overshadowed by the manner in which it was reached, particularly Albanese’s perceived delay in endorsing an inquiry he now deems essential for national healing.
On Friday, Albanese defended his approach, emphasizing his focus on immediate measures while engaging with the community to determine further actions. “I have listened to people. We’ve considered everyone’s position. Is it possible to build unity in this way? I think it very much is. I’m very pleased that it’s been welcomed across the political spectrum. At no stage have I engaged in political rhetoric during this period,” he told ABC News Breakfast.
Political Reactions and Public Perception
The community’s reaction to Albanese’s handling of the situation is mixed. While some sympathize with his position, others criticize what they perceive as a coordinated political attack by the Coalition and right-wing media. This correspondent has received numerous emails expressing such sentiments.
The context of this political shift cannot be ignored. Opposition leader Sussan Ley may have pressured Albanese into calling for a royal commission, but her actions may not endear her to voters. Unlike Ley and other critics who view Albanese’s decision as a capitulation, some see it as a demonstration of leadership adaptability. Independent MP Allegra Spender remarked, “I’ve always had the view that leaders who change their mind and say, ‘OK, I understand where people are coming from and I’m going to change my view,’ that is not a sign of weakness.”
Implications for Albanese and the Labor Party
Despite the royal commission’s announcement, the political ramifications for Albanese are undeniable. Some within his party acknowledge potential damage, though none question his leadership’s future. The critical issue is whether his authority over the Labor caucus and public trust has been compromised, affecting the remainder of his term and beyond.
The mechanics of Virginia Bell’s 12-month royal commission are still being finalized, including which parts will remain confidential to avoid influencing the criminal trial of the surviving alleged shooter. The inquiry will ensure continued scrutiny of the government’s approach to antisemitism, posing challenging questions for the administration.
Looking Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities
After a triumphant 2025, marked by a landslide election victory and the Coalition’s internal turmoil, Albanese faces a more challenging 2026. Economic headwinds, budget constraints, and the complex implementation of new aged care and disability care models await. Additionally, there is pressure from Labor’s base for a more ambitious agenda, particularly concerning housing.
The aftermath of the Bondi incident raises questions about Albanese’s confidence and willingness to take political risks. Could this lead to a governmental stagnation similar to the post-2023 referendum period? It took decisive action in January 2024, reversing stage-three tax cuts, to reinvigorate his leadership.
Now, two years later, Albanese confronts the most significant political challenge of his nearly 30-year career in federal parliament. This time, there is no deal to negotiate or adversary to outwit—only a nation to lead.
