18 March, 2026
former-ais-athletes-criticize-documentary-amid-abuse-concerns

Former athletes from the Australian Institute of Sport (AIS) are voicing strong concerns over the Australian Sports Commission’s (ASC) handling of a new documentary, Forging Champions, which they fear could trigger trauma among those who suffered abuse during their time at the institute. The documentary, set to air on Channel 9 this Monday, chronicles the 40-year history of the AIS and features interviews with some of Australia’s most celebrated sports figures.

The controversy stems from fears that the documentary may present a sanitized version of the AIS’s history, potentially glossing over the physical and psychological abuse that several former athletes claim to have endured. These athletes argue that such a portrayal could be harmful to those who experienced trauma during their tenure at the institute.

Concerns Over Documentary’s Impact

Former AIS gymnast Jenny Richardson has been particularly vocal, having reached out to ASC Chief Executive Kieren Perkins to express her outrage. She contends that airing the documentary could cause significant distress to those still grappling with the aftermath of their experiences at the AIS.

“I want him and the restorative team who are meant to be helping me not to put this to air because they know it’s going to damage a lot of people,” Richardson told ABC Sport.

Richardson is among several former athletes who were surprised by an email from Perkins, which was sent to forewarn them about the documentary. The email acknowledged the past abuses and emphasized the ASC’s commitment to supporting affected athletes.

Historical Context of Abuse at AIS

The AIS, established in 1981, has been a cornerstone of Australia’s sports development, but its legacy is marred by allegations of abuse. In 2021, the ASC acknowledged that unacceptable practices occurred during the institute’s live-in scholarship program, which ended in 2012. Many former athletes have since come forward with stories of physical, psychological, and sometimes sexual abuse.

One such athlete, known as “Grace,” who competed in the 1980s and 1990s, described the email from Perkins as a “power punch,” highlighting the trauma it triggered. Grace has also requested that the documentary not be aired, fearing it could retraumatize former athletes.

“As an athlete in the 80s and 90s, I think the Australian public need to be aware it wasn’t just vulnerable young girls that were abused, it was men and women, girls, boys, any sport, all suffered different forms of abuse,” Grace said.

Responses from the Australian Sports Commission

In response to the backlash, Perkins emphasized that the documentary aims to reflect on the AIS’s journey, including its challenges and growth. He assured that the communication with former athletes was trauma-informed, allowing them to engage with the project if they wished.

“The Australian Sports Commission (ASC) leadership acknowledges that harmful behaviours occurred in the past, that this was not acceptable, and that we remain committed to apology, accountability, and athlete support,” Perkins stated.

However, the ASC’s decision to proceed with the documentary has been met with skepticism, particularly given the ongoing payments and support offered through its Restorative Program, which provides financial compensation and counseling to affected athletes.

Ongoing Struggles and Support

Jenny Richardson’s story exemplifies the long-term impact of the abuse. She has battled an eating disorder for 40 years, attributing it to the psychological abuse she suffered at the AIS. Despite receiving settlements and ongoing support through the Restorative Program, Richardson feels the documentary undermines the ASC’s previous apologies.

“One minute you’re apologising for the harm caused but then backflip highlighting how magnificent the AIS is disregarding its wrong doings,” Richardson wrote in response to Perkins’s email.

The ASC has committed to continuing support for athletes who experienced harm, even as funding for the Restorative Program is set to end in December. This commitment includes access to the ASC’s Mental Health Referral Network for ongoing counseling.

Implications and Future Considerations

The controversy surrounding Forging Champions underscores the delicate balance between celebrating sporting achievements and acknowledging past wrongs. As the documentary airs, the ASC faces the challenge of addressing the concerns of former athletes while maintaining its commitment to transparency and healing.

Moving forward, the ASC’s actions will likely be scrutinized, not only by former athletes but also by the broader public, as it navigates the complex legacy of the AIS. The organization’s ability to reconcile its past with its future aspirations will be crucial in rebuilding trust and fostering a more supportive environment for athletes.