25 December, 2025
tom-silvagni-sentenced-to-six-years-for-rape-a-case-of-deception-and-impact

Tom Silvagni, the 23-year-old son of former Australian rules football star Stephen Silvagni, has been sentenced to six years and two months in prison for two counts of rape. The sentencing follows a jury’s guilty verdict earlier this month, where Silvagni was found to have impersonated a friend to gain access to a woman’s bedroom at his family home, subsequently attacking her.

The maximum jail term for rape in Australia is 25 years, with sentences typically ranging from seven to ten years. Judge Gregory Lyon, presiding over the County Court, allowed the sentence to be broadcast live, lifting a suppression order that had kept Silvagni’s identity confidential for over a year. Lyon criticized Silvagni for showing no remorse and described his actions as egregious, highlighting a lack of empathy towards the victim.

Details of the Crime and Court Proceedings

During the trial, the court heard that the incident occurred on January 13, 2024, when the victim visited the Silvagni family home in Balwyn North. Silvagni, his girlfriend, and a childhood friend were present, along with the victim. After an evening together, the victim and Silvagni’s friend retired to a bedroom, where they engaged in consensual sex. The friend left shortly after, calling an Uber to return home.

Silvagni then entered the victim’s room, pretending to be his friend, and raped her twice. Despite the victim’s pleas for him to stop and her suspicion that it was Silvagni, he continued the assault. In an attempt to cover up his crime, Silvagni altered the Uber receipt to suggest his friend left much later than he did.

“Although your crimes rose from an opportunity you could not have envisioned … your crimes were marked by planning, cunning and strategy in order to deceive,” Judge Lyon remarked during the sentencing.

Family Background and Public Reaction

Tom Silvagni is the youngest son of Stephen Silvagni, a Carlton Football Club legend, and Jo Silvagni, a former television host. The case has drawn significant public attention, with more than 60 members of the public and press attending the sentencing. The victim, supported by her family, bravely faced Silvagni in court to deliver her impact statement.

Despite the conviction, Silvagni’s family has expressed unwavering support for him, with his parents stating they will continue to fight to clear his name. This support was noted by Judge Lyon, who acknowledged Silvagni’s good prospects for rehabilitation, though he emphasized the absence of remorse as a significant barrier.

Legal and Social Implications

The case has sparked discussions about the legal process and the challenges faced by victims of sexual assault. The victim, who chose to remain anonymous, highlighted the difficulty of obtaining a guilty verdict in such cases. She expressed her determination to raise awareness about the judicial process through online platforms.

“This man was found guilty. Do you know how rare and hard it is for someone to be found guilty of this specific crime? Twelve random people unanimously agreed that he was guilty ‘beyond reasonable doubt’,” the victim wrote.

The suppression order, initially granted to protect Silvagni’s identity, was a point of contention, with media outlets challenging its validity. Ultimately, the order was lifted when it became clear that Silvagni’s identity was widely known, marking a turning point in the case’s public narrative.

Looking Ahead

As Tom Silvagni begins his prison sentence, the case continues to resonate within the community, highlighting issues of justice, accountability, and the impact of sexual violence. The legal proceedings have underscored the complexities of balancing the rights of the accused with the need for transparency and victim support.

The victim’s courage in sharing her story and seeking justice serves as a powerful reminder of the ongoing struggle many face in similar circumstances. As society grapples with these challenges, the case of Tom Silvagni remains a poignant example of the need for continued dialogue and reform in the justice system.