Renowned Australian author Helen Garner has voiced strong opposition to the State Library of Victoria’s plans to cut jobs and pivot towards digital projects, describing the transformation as turning the institution into “party central.” Garner’s comments come as over 220 writers, scholars, and researchers have signed an open letter urging the library’s board and executive to maintain public accountability.
The proposed restructuring, which has sparked outrage among literary and academic circles, aims to reduce staff and refocus the 171-year-old institution on digital experiences tailored for tourists. Garner, reflecting on her personal connection to the library, lamented, “In the 70s I wrote my first book [Monkey Grip] there. In those days it was a temple of calm, a demilitarised zone, a refuge from racket, right in the middle of the city.”
Widespread Literary Support
The open letter, which was delivered to the library’s board chair Christine Christian and copied to the Minister for Creative Industries, Colin Brooks, has attracted signatures from prominent literary figures. These include Pulitzer Prize-winning author Geraldine Brooks, Nobel laureate JM Coetzee, and Booker Prize winner Thomas Keneally, among others.
Signatories argue that the proposed cuts, which include reducing the number of reference librarians from 25 to 10 and outsourcing critical IT roles, undermine the library’s core mission. The letter states,
“We the undersigned writers and researchers esteem the State Library of Victoria, and believe strongly in the importance of its public mission.”
Impact of Proposed Changes
Under the proposed changes, 39 jobs would be eliminated, and many publicly accessible computers would be removed. Library staff have accused management of prioritizing “digital vanity projects” over the library’s traditional roles. A spokesperson for the library defended the changes, stating they reflect a commitment to serving the community effectively.
This development follows recent calls from the library workers’ union, CPSU Victoria, for a public meeting to discuss the proposal. A separate petition by CPSU Victoria has already garnered over 2,260 signatures, highlighting widespread concern.
Historical Context and Future Implications
The State Library of Victoria, established in 1854, has long been a cornerstone of Melbourne’s cultural and intellectual life. Garner’s critique resonates with those who recall the library’s historical role as a sanctuary for scholars and writers. The shift towards digital projects raises questions about the future of public libraries in the digital age.
According to sources, the library’s executive has engaged in consultations with staff and the CPSU, asserting that the library will continue to provide necessary computer access for research and reference activities. However, the proposed changes have sparked a debate about the balance between digital innovation and preserving traditional library services.
A spokesperson for the Victorian government emphasized that the Library Board of Victoria is responsible for organizational and staffing decisions. As the debate continues, stakeholders are calling for reforms in library governance to include the perspectives of scholars and public users.
As this situation unfolds, the literary community and the public await further developments, hoping for a resolution that honors the library’s legacy while embracing necessary innovation.
