The integration of artificial intelligence in the latest installment of the popular video game series, Call of Duty: Black Ops 7, has sparked controversy, leading a U.S. lawmaker to call for regulatory measures. Representative Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who serves a district encompassing much of Silicon Valley, has voiced concerns over AI’s role in potentially displacing human jobs, following reports that the game features AI-generated icons, posters, and achievements. Gamers have criticized these elements as “AI slop,” raising questions about the balance between technological advancement and job security.
On Friday, Khanna expressed his stance on social media, stating, “We need regulations that prevent companies from using AI to eliminate jobs to extract greater profits.” He further emphasized the need for artists to have a say in AI deployment, suggesting they should share in the profits and proposing a tax on mass displacement.
Growing Concerns Over AI’s Impact on Employment
This development follows increasing scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers regarding AI’s potential to disrupt the job market. Earlier this month, two U.S. senators introduced legislation aimed at requiring companies to report AI-related job losses to the federal government, a move intended to monitor the technology’s impact on employment.
While Activision Blizzard, the studio behind Call of Duty and now owned by Microsoft, has not yet responded to requests for comment, the issue reflects a broader debate about AI’s role in the gaming industry and beyond. Many gaming companies see AI as a tool to streamline development processes, potentially reducing costs and enhancing creativity.
Industry Perspectives and Economic Implications
Meanwhile, industry experts and commentators have weighed in on the potential benefits and drawbacks of AI integration. David Friedberg, cohost of the All-In business podcast, argued on social media that AI could lead to the creation of new, higher-paying jobs. “By trying to prevent organizational evolution due to technology, you are limiting technology’s ability to create more value for workers,” he wrote.
Khanna, however, cautioned against the unchecked expansion of AI, noting, “No one is saying that AI may not help with entrepreneurs or small business or medicine. But we cannot allow it to further the income divide and regional divide that is tearing this country apart.” He advocated for a balanced approach that ensures AI benefits society without repeating the mistakes of past globalization efforts.
“As soon as the gov’t creates ‘taxes on automation,’ it shackles workers to old jobs,” Friedberg tweeted in response, suggesting that AI could empower game designers to compete with large studios.
Historical Context and Future Outlook
The debate over AI in the workforce is reminiscent of past technological shifts, such as the industrial revolution and the rise of the internet, which both brought about significant changes in employment patterns. Historically, such transitions have led to the creation of new industries and job opportunities, but not without periods of adjustment and displacement.
Looking forward, the conversation around AI and employment is likely to intensify as the technology continues to evolve. Policymakers, industry leaders, and workers will need to collaborate to navigate the challenges and opportunities presented by AI, ensuring that its integration into various sectors is equitable and beneficial for all stakeholders.
As the dialogue continues, the gaming industry may serve as a microcosm for broader societal debates about the role of AI in modern economies. The outcome of these discussions could shape the future of work and the balance between human creativity and technological innovation.
