Queensland will continue to rely on coal-fired power until at least 2046, as Energy Minister David Janetzki announces the abandonment of the former Labor government’s plan to phase out the power source by 2035. This decision marks a significant shift from the previous administration’s commitment to a staged closure of government-owned coal assets.
Under the leadership of Annastacia Palaszczuk, the former Labor government had pledged to end reliance on coal by 2035, aiming for a transition towards renewable energy. However, the current Liberal National Party (LNP) government has decided to extend the lifespan of publicly owned coal-fired power stations, some of which are among the newest in the country, for at least another 11 years past the original deadline.
Almost a year after the LNP’s election victory, Janetzki is set to unveil Queensland’s new energy roadmap on Friday, detailing the future composition of the state’s energy grid. The Crisafulli government has already announced plans to abandon the state’s renewable energy target, while maintaining its commitment to achieving net zero emissions by 2050. However, uncertainty remains over whether the government will adhere to a legislated 75 percent reduction target by 2035, especially in light of the coal extension.
Implications of the New Energy Plan
Janetzki emphasized that the new energy strategy focuses on investing in current assets while preparing for future needs. He stated, “Coal will remain part of the state’s generation mix for decades and the former Labor government’s decision to close coal units by 2035 regardless of their condition is officially abolished today – ultimately, that position was unrealistic, captured by ideology and fundamentally dishonest.”
He further described the plan as “sensible and pragmatic,” grounded in economics and engineering rather than ideology. According to Janetzki, the strategy will meet Queensland’s energy needs, benefit tens of thousands of jobs and communities, and provide investment certainty for private sector gas and renewables investors.
Reactions from Conservation Groups and the Coal Industry
The confirmation of the coal power extension has sparked a mixed response. Conservation groups have criticized the decision, while the coal industry has welcomed it. Dave Copeman, director of the Queensland Conservation Council, accused the government of catering to “fossil fuel loving party members and donors,” arguing that the plan is illogical given the ageing infrastructure of some coal assets, particularly the stations at Callide in Central Queensland.
“The Queensland LNP’s moves to axe renewable energy and storage projects, bank on expensive gas and keep Queenslanders chained to failing coal power stations is a recipe for higher power bills and less reliable energy,” Copeman said. “Queensland’s coal power stations are increasingly unreliable as they age. They were offline a staggering 78 times over the last summer period because they keep breaking down.”
Conversely, industry lobby group Coal Australia praised the announcement, asserting that coal remains the cheapest and most reliable energy source. Stuart Bocking, CEO of Coal Australia, stated, “This decision of the Queensland government ensures it has all the flexibility it needs to keep the Queensland economy strong by extending the life of government-owned generators for as long as necessary based on demand and the power station’s structural integrity and economic viability.”
Coal Australia highlighted that global demand for coal reached an all-time high in 2024, with the International Energy Agency forecasting even higher demand in 2025.
Historical Context and Future Outlook
The move to extend coal reliance in Queensland reflects broader global energy trends, where despite growing investments in renewables, coal remains a significant part of the energy mix in many countries. Historically, Queensland has been a major coal producer, and its economy has been heavily tied to fossil fuels.
As the world grapples with climate change, the balance between economic interests and environmental responsibilities remains a contentious issue. The Queensland government’s decision underscores the complexities of transitioning to a sustainable energy future while maintaining economic stability.
Looking ahead, the debate over energy policy in Queensland is likely to continue, with stakeholders from various sectors advocating for their interests. The government’s roadmap will be closely scrutinized for its impact on energy prices, reliability, and environmental commitments.
The announcement comes at a critical time as global energy dynamics shift and the pressure to reduce carbon emissions intensifies. Whether Queensland can navigate these challenges while achieving its long-term goals remains to be seen.
