
An NRL player at the center of a perjury case against a former police officer has expressed disappointment over the leniency of the sentence handed down to the ex-cop. The officer, known as Officer A for legal reasons, received a one-year intensive corrections order, akin to a suspended jail sentence, after pleading guilty to providing false evidence during the high-profile rape trial of former St George player Jack de Belin and co-accused Callan Sinclair in 2020.
“It was obviously a little bit light, but it is what it is,” de Belin remarked outside Wollongong District Court following the sentencing. “What’s kept Cal and myself so strong throughout this is our innocence.”
Background of the Case
Officer A was found to have lied about the contents of text messages between de Belin and a contact saved as “Craig Lawyer” on a Nokia mobile phone. He falsely testified that the texts contained only “Dragons business,” despite knowing they likely included privileged conversations between the player and his lawyer, Craig Osborne.
De Belin and Sinclair were first charged in December 2018 and faced two trials before the charges were eventually dropped by prosecutors in mid-2021. The case severely impacted de Belin’s career, as he challenged the NRL’s controversial no-fault stand-down rule, which sidelined him for several years.
Judicial Perspective and Mental Health Considerations
Despite the seriousness of the perjury offense, Judge Christine Mendes noted that Officer A’s significant mental health problems mitigated the severity of the sentence required. “He is a highly fragile, broken man,” she stated, highlighting that the officer had shown clear signs of undiagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder for several years leading up to the false testimony in February 2020.
The judge rejected the prosecution’s argument that the officer had a sophisticated and well-thought-out plan to commit perjury. “Officer A did not seek professional treatment until Feb 2020 … he was clearly unwell and suffering,” she added.
The Impact on De Belin and Sinclair
De Belin and Sinclair consistently denied the allegations of sexually assaulting a then-19-year-old woman in December 2018, maintaining that the encounter was a consensual threesome. The woman alleged she was attacked by de Belin in a North Wollongong unit and then cried as the men took turns assaulting her.
A Wollongong jury was discharged less than two days into its deliberations in November 2020, having informed the court it could “absolutely not” reach a verdict on any charges. Similarly, a Sydney jury in mid-2021 spent over a week deliberating before becoming deadlocked on nearly all charges. It acquitted de Belin and Sinclair of one charge each, and prosecutors subsequently dropped the remaining charges.
“The case cruelled the forward’s career despite his legal efforts to challenge the NRL’s controversial no-fault stand-down rule that sidelined him for several years.”
Reactions and Future Implications
Sinclair’s father, Terry Sinclair, expressed his belief that the police had been motivated by a “blatant and concerted” effort to convict a high-profile footballer. This sentiment underscores the broader implications of the case, which has sparked discussions about the intersection of sports, law, and media scrutiny.
The case highlights the challenges faced by public figures in high-stakes legal battles and raises questions about the adequacy of mental health support for law enforcement officers. As the NRL and legal communities continue to grapple with these issues, the case of Jack de Belin remains a poignant example of the complexities involved in navigating the justice system.
For more updates on this story and other breaking news, download the 9NEWS app available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.