7 October, 2025
trump-administration-considers-wall-street-tactics-for-critical-mineral-supply

The Trump administration is exploring unconventional financial strategies more typical of Wall Street than Washington as it seeks to secure equity holdings in producers of critical minerals. This move aims to strengthen supply chains deemed essential for national security. Earlier this month, over a dozen Australian mining firms convened in Washington to meet with officials from various U.S. agencies. According to sources familiar with the discussions, these meetings highlighted the administration’s interest in acquiring equity-like stakes in companies.

While the discussions did not focus on specific deals, they explored financial mechanisms the government might employ. Some officials expressed interest in acquiring warrants, which would grant the government the right to purchase shares in these firms. This initiative underscores the Trump administration’s willingness to use tools rarely deployed by the government to establish a domestic supply chain for minerals crucial to defense and other industries, particularly amid concerns over China’s dominance in this sector.

Strategic Meetings and High-Level Involvement

One significant meeting was hosted by Australian Ambassador Kevin Rudd and attended by senior Trump administration officials responsible for policy on critical minerals. Among them were David Copley, senior director for global supply chains at the National Security Council; Joshua Kroon from the Commerce Department; and John P. Gallagher, deputy chief of staff of Deputy Secretary of Defense Steve Feinberg. The presence of these high-level officials at the forum indicates the administration’s serious commitment to this initiative.

The message communicated to the mining firms reflects the administration’s proactive approach in deploying financial tools to bolster the U.S. mining sector. This strategy is further evidenced by the Pentagon’s unprecedented $400 million stake acquisition in rare earth producer MP Materials Corp. earlier this year, a deal led by Feinberg, a private equity billionaire and co-founder of Cerberus Capital Management.

Implications and Strategic Goals

According to White House Spokeswoman Taylor Rogers, “The Trump Administration is keeping all options open to accomplish this America First goal while guaranteeing a good bargain for American taxpayers.” She emphasized that a key priority of President Trump’s energy dominance agenda is to build the world’s strongest mining sector and boost the production of critical minerals, thereby enhancing economic and national security.

This development comes as the administration embraces a more interventionist role in the economy to support strategic industries amid escalating great-power rivalry with China. The administration has already taken a 10% stake in Intel Corp. and a so-called golden share in United States Steel Corp. Critical minerals remain a top priority, especially after China imposed export controls on rare earths and permanent magnets earlier this year, causing significant concern in the U.S.

Financial Techniques and Historical Context

While the use of warrant options by the government might be unusual, it is not without precedent. During the height of the pandemic, the federal government took warrants to buy airline stock as part of temporary bailout programs. Legal analysts note that such strategies have typically been employed in response to crises affecting specific industries.

Warrants, which effectively allow the holder to purchase a company’s equity, could provide a way for the government to profit without upfront cash investments. They also offer a mechanism to protect taxpayer money against potential risks associated with these deals.

Future Prospects and Industry Reactions

The meetings with foreign companies highlight the administration’s willingness to invest overseas, offering officials an opportunity for fact-finding and a platform to communicate their expectations to the industry. However, some companies in the field have struggled to determine which government agencies to engage with, as the Trump administration revives efforts to create a fully domestic supply chain for rare earth magnets.

In some instances, the Pentagon has taken the lead, as demonstrated by the MP Materials deal. In others, the White House has engaged directly with stakeholders, such as during meetings with technology and recycling companies to discuss ways to rapidly increase the production of permanent magnets using rare earth elements.

As the administration continues to navigate these complex waters, the success of these strategies remains to be seen. However, the move represents a significant shift in how the U.S. government approaches the critical minerals sector, potentially setting a precedent for future economic interventions.